Another controversial third umpire decision!
Pad first or bat first - it was a very close call, and it's given as bat first.
Right decision? #AUSvsINDpic.twitter.com/RFmw4Erwm6
Definitely pad first and Umpire didn't even went for ball tracking. Same old aussies cheating again!!! pic.twitter.com/jzuIqtEC4h
— Div(@div_yumm) December 7, 2024 async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"> > <Even if it was pad first, it would have stayed with the umpire's not out call pic.twitter.com/jQH5EaIUcD
Why are you not sure? Why can't you show this slow motion to third umpire!
That's terrible terrible technology usage!
India or Australia, that's a horrible usage of technology.
Haha that review if this was indian player specially kohli it would have been pad first. But if it's an australian player so bat first.
When Indians Bat
"No Conclusive Evidence Still Decision Overturned - OUT"
When Aussies Bat
"Clear Evidence Still Decision Not Overturned - NOT OUT"
Well Played Aussies ????@CricketAus#cheating#AUSvIND #INDvsAUS
When Aussies Bat
"Clear Evidence Still Decision Not Overturned - NOT OUT"
Well Played Aussies @CricketAus#cheating#AUSvIND #INDvsAUS